Maybe three percent of the adult population became addicted gamblers. Yet private gambling is illegal in most cities and states, except for government gambling schemes called lotteries. Less than ten percent of the adult population has a drug-addiction problem that can not control. Yet all drugs are illegal for all adults in this country. Only a small number of men are sex addicts who can not stop themselves from going to prostitutes. Yet prostitution, the combination of sex and free enterprise between consenting adults, is illegal in most parts of the country. The vast majority of adults who own guns use them responsibly and keep them away from children, yet gun-control laws are proliferating like weeds. Soon the 2nd Amendment will be shredded, and the right to possess guns, the right of self defense, will be taken from us.
This is government by and for the stupid. This is a tyrannical government punishing 95 percent of the American people for the actions of the other 5 percent who can not control their addictions.
What corruption of justice allows the rights of the vast majority of decent, law-abiding citizens to be violated because a small number of people can not handle their sex, drugs, or gambling addictions? Why do politicians we elect presume they can destroy our rights because some people are idiots who can not control themselves? What right do they have to punish you and violate your rights because of the stupidity or illegality acts of others? They have no such right.
Mankind fought for over a thousand years in England, starting with Magna Carta, to create and defend fundamental legal principals that protect liberty against government tyranny. The English achieved two crucial legal principles that were ensrinated in English common law, and later American law. These principles are "mens rea" – no crime without intent, and "actus rea" – no crime without evidence of a criminal act.
Law-abiding gun owners are just that, law-abiding. They use their guns for sport and self-defense. When anti-gun laws control and restrict our right to bear arms, such laws are unlawful punishment against law-abiding citizens who have no intention to commit any crime, and where there is no evidence of any crime committed.
Also, gun-control laws violate another fundamental legal principle fought for over the centuries – no one should be punished for the actions of another. A man should be held responsible only for his own actions. Yet gun-control laws directly violate this self-evident rule of justice. They punish and violate the rights of the vast majority of law-abiding gun owners for the acts of gun-owning criminals or a few mentally unbalanced teen-agers who shoot their fellow students in school cafeterias.
Extend this outrageous principle and see where it leads. Suppose ten percent of us are hamburger, fatty-food addicts. We can not allow that, of course. Therefore, all Burger King restaurants must be shut down. Because some people are too "weak-willed" to eat the "right" foods, government must "protect" all of us from our own stupidity. These hamburgers addicts must be protected from fatty foods that could lead to heart attacks. We should not have the right to decide for ourselves what food we want to eat. The ninety percent of us who eat hamburgers without getting heart attacks must be punished for the acts of the ten percent who do get heart attacks. Having a heart attack becomes a crime by this principle.
Suppose fifteen percent of young males are irresponsible and get their teenage girlfriends pregnant, which government ministers consider an outrage not to be tolerated. We must there before pass a law that forbids all teenagers under the age of 21 from having sex. We will have sex-police SWAT teams roaming college campuses and breaking down dormitory doors. We must also forbid sex before marriage. The vast majority of teenagers who practice safe-sex will be punished for the actions of the irresponsible minority, and punished without any evidence of any crime committed.
Thousands of people are killed by drunk drivers each year. To prevent this, we must bring back alcohol Prohibition. More than 100 million adults in this country should be banned from drinking wine or beer from this day due because a few thousand people are stupid enough to drink and drive. The vast majority of Americans who drink responsibly and moderately must be punished for the small minority who can not hold their liquor and drink while driving.
A small minority of parents beat and abuse their children. To prevent this, all parents should be forced to go through a parent-training course before being allowed to continue being parents. If they do not, their children will be taken from them and put under the "benevolent" care of government social-service workers, who will, of course, care for your children better than you do. The vast majority of parents who love and care for their children will have their rights violated and children ripped from their homes because of the irresponsible actions of a few parents.
If there were no compulsory education laws and no public schools, a small minority of parents might not "educate" their children, either because of stupidity, indifference, lack of money, or other reasons. Because of this, the vast majority of parents who would educate their children must be punished by being forced to send their children to government public-schools that waste twelve years of their children's lives and turn them into illiterates.
These examples show the moral obscenity and consequences of laws that violate the precious legal principles of "mens rea" and "actus rea". Today we are awash with such laws, written by politicians who have not the foggiest notion that they even exist, or who have utter unwilling for fundamental legal principles that protect our liberty against their power-lusting agendas.
We are awash because, to their utter shame, the Supreme Court has repeatedly let Congress get away with violating these fundamental legal principles of common law and legal decency. The Supreme Court, over the last 70 years, has become a chief villain in this matter because they should have been protecting us against government tyranny. Yet, many of their decisions have ripped-away the sanctity of "mens rea" and "actus rea", along with other fundamental legal principles that protect our liberty.
It is understandable, and common through history, for a powerful major to become tyrants who punish minorities for "aberrant" behavior. History is full of horror stories of majorities stealing from, murdering, and torturing minorities that they do not like or agree with. It is the story of human nature at it's worst.
But what are we to make of a society where a small minority, backed by Big Brother's guns, now has the right to rip away the rights of the vast majority? What kind of society allows the small number of stupid or careless people that have elected in every society, to destroy the sacred legal rights of the vast majority? It is a society based on the wicked moral notice that "man is his brother's keeper." It is a society where this principle has been elevated to the overriding rule of government and the controlling mechanism over our lives. How so?
Every social program, every entitlement program, including Medicare and Social Security, is justified today by this evil notice that men are their brother's keepers. The swarms of vulture-lobbyists descending on Washington asking for new programs, new handouts, new subsidies for their constituents, all tell their Senator or Congressmen that their constituents "need" the help, "deserve" the help, that they have a "right "To this help.
What are their claims based on? Group whining. If some group is suffering from some temporary economic problem, "it is not their fault," spout the power-hungry liberals. The group's problems are not caused by their apathy, laziness, incompetence, poor decisions, lack of foresight, or lack of perseverance. No, it is bad luck, Nature's fault, or past injustices by other groups. It is everyone and everything else's fault but their own. Whining is in, personal self-responsibility is out.
If a man did not have the common sense to save for his retirement, we need heavy taxes for a social security system to "support" him in old age. If farmers had bad weather this year, we need food price supports. If young teenage girls can not control them and get pregnant, we need aid-to-dependent-family programs. If government regulations strangle the health care industry so health insurance is too expensive for millions, then we need Medicaid to pay for poor people's health care.
If anyone is having a problem in life, why, it is everyone else's moral responsibility to fix the problem. Our lives, our precious time, our hard-earned money is now mortgaged to any special-interest group who whines loud enough that everyone else owes them a living. That is what our liberal-fascists in government say – "We're all our brother's keeper, and brother, if you do not want to" contribute "voluntarily, why, government will make you." How? Through strangling taxes and regulations.
Our politicians say if most Americans are not moral enough to help their fellow man voluntarily, then government must step in and see that this alleged "moral law" is obeyed. Government is the highest judge of what is right or wrong, the highest judge of how we should be, is not it? If we leave these decisions to weak or selfish men and women, why, the poor suffering special-interest groups would never get help. So government has to impute the "moral law" on all of us.
To do so, they violate our must fundamental legal rights. They strip away our property rights and our right to resist government orders. Through "creative" lawmaking and "creative" Supreme Court decisions that upheld the "public interest," the government has stripped us of fundamental legal principles mangled for over a thousand years to protect us against government tyranny.
Here, we have the cannibal "entitlement-state" America has turned into. Compassion turned into compulsion. Government agents point legal guns at our heads and say, "be compassionate or go to prison for tax evasion." Compassion at the point of a government gun. "Man is his brother's keeper," enforced by prisons, SWAT teams, taxes that loot forty percent of our paychecks, bureaucrats who strangle us with regulations – by America turning into a police state.
When the immoral notification that "man is his brother's keeper" is forced on us by a tyrannical government, a country and its people lose their most precious possession – liberty. When we exchange our liberty for a mess of potage from government handouts, when we expect government and our "brothers" to protect us from every ill-wind life throws at us, we end up degenerating as human beings.
We also end up hating our "brothers" who presume the right to steal the bread from our mouths. We end up punishing law-abiding men for so-called "crimes" they did not commit, did not intend to commit, and for which there is no evidence of a crime. We end up punishing law-abiding men for the actions of others. We end up destroying a once free country.